Why Amines Are Basic
Like ammonia, the nitrogen atom of an amine is $sp^3$ hybridised and pyramidal, with three bonds to hydrogen or carbon and a fourth $sp^3$ orbital holding an unshared pair of electrons. It is this lone pair that defines the chemistry of amines. NCERT states it plainly: amines "have an unshared pair of electrons on nitrogen atom due to which they behave as Lewis base." A Lewis base donates an electron pair; a Brønsted base accepts a proton. The same lone pair does both.
When an amine meets a mineral acid it forms an ammonium salt, and treatment of that salt with a strong base such as $\ce{NaOH}$ regenerates the free amine. The acid–base equilibrium in water is the reference reaction for measuring strength:
$$\ce{R-NH2 + H2O <=> R-NH3^+ + OH^-}$$
The position of this equilibrium is what we quantify. The more readily the lone pair is donated — and the more stable the resulting cation — the stronger the base.
Basicity is about the lone pair, not the N–H hydrogens
Students sometimes confuse basicity (lone pair donation) with the acidity of N–H bonds. Tertiary amines have no N–H hydrogen at all, yet they are still bases — the lone pair is intact. The number of alkyl groups changes how basic the amine is, never whether it is basic.
Rule: every amine, primary through tertiary, has exactly one donatable lone pair on nitrogen.
Kb, pKb and Base Strength
NCERT defines the basicity constant from the equilibrium above. For the reaction of an amine with water,
$$K_b = \frac{[\ce{R-NH3^+}][\ce{OH^-}]}{[\ce{R-NH2}]} \qquad\text{and}\qquad pK_b = -\log K_b$$
The textbook statement to memorise is exact: "Larger the value of $K_b$ or smaller the value of $pK_b$, stronger is the base." Because $pK_b$ is a negative logarithm, the two scales run in opposite directions. When a question asks you to rank amines, translate it immediately: lowest $pK_b$ = strongest base; highest $pK_b$ = weakest base.
NCERT pins the reference points. Ammonia has $pK_b = 4.75$. Aliphatic amines fall below it (range roughly 3 to 4.22), so they are stronger bases. Aromatic amines like aniline rise far above it. Table 9.3 lists the aqueous-phase values:
| Amine (IUPAC) | Formula | pKb (aq.) | Class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methanamine | $\ce{CH3NH2}$ | 3.38 | 1° aliphatic |
| N-Methylmethanamine | $\ce{(CH3)2NH}$ | 3.27 | 2° aliphatic |
| N,N-Dimethylmethanamine | $\ce{(CH3)3N}$ | 4.22 | 3° aliphatic |
| Ethanamine | $\ce{C2H5NH2}$ | 3.29 | 1° aliphatic |
| N-Ethylethanamine | $\ce{(C2H5)2NH}$ | 3.00 | 2° aliphatic |
| N,N-Diethylethanamine | $\ce{(C2H5)3N}$ | 3.25 | 3° aliphatic |
| Benzenamine (aniline) | $\ce{C6H5NH2}$ | 9.38 | aromatic |
| Phenylmethanamine | $\ce{C6H5CH2NH2}$ | 4.70 | 1° (benzyl) |
| N-Methylaniline | $\ce{C6H5NHCH3}$ | 9.30 | aromatic 2° |
| N,N-Dimethylaniline | $\ce{C6H5N(CH3)2}$ | 8.92 | aromatic 3° |
Two patterns leap out of this table. The aliphatic amines cluster near $pK_b \approx 3$, well below ammonia. The aniline family sits near $pK_b \approx 9$, far above ammonia. Everything that follows is the explanation of those two clusters — and of the small, irregular spread within the aliphatic cluster.
The Inductive Effect of Alkyl Groups
NCERT frames structure-basicity as a competition: "Basic character of an amine depends upon the ease of formation of the cation by accepting a proton from the acid. The more stable the cation is relative to the amine, more basic is the amine."
Alkyl groups are electron-releasing — they exert a positive inductive effect ($+I$). They "push electrons towards nitrogen and thus make the unshared electron pair more available for sharing with the proton." After protonation, the same $+I$ effect helps to disperse the positive charge on the substituted ammonium cation, stabilising it. Both halves of the argument — a more available lone pair and a more stabilised cation — point the same way: alkyl substitution should raise basicity.
Carried to its conclusion, this predicts that basic strength rises with the number of alkyl groups: $\ce{3^\circ > 2^\circ > 1^\circ > NH3}$. NCERT confirms that this expectation is genuinely realised — but only under specific conditions, which the next section makes precise.
The whole basicity argument rests on the pyramidal, lone-pair-bearing nitrogen. Revise it in Amine Structure & Classification.
Gas Phase vs Aqueous Phase
This is the single most examined subtlety in the topic. NCERT is explicit that the inductive prediction holds in one phase and breaks in the other.
In the gaseous phase, the inductive effect acts alone, with no solvent to interfere. The order is exactly the one $+I$ predicts:
$$\text{gas phase: } \ce{(CH3)3N > (CH3)2NH > CH3NH2 > NH3}$$
In the aqueous phase, a second factor enters. After the amine accepts a proton, the substituted ammonium cation is stabilised "not only by electron releasing effect of the alkyl group ($+I$) but also by solvation with water molecules." Solvation works through hydrogen bonds from the N–H hydrogens of the cation to surrounding water. NCERT gives the governing rule: "The greater the size of the ion, lesser will be the solvation and the less stabilised is the ion."
A primary ammonium ion $\ce{R-NH3^+}$ has three N–H bonds available for hydrogen bonding to water; a secondary $\ce{R2NH2^+}$ has two; a tertiary $\ce{R3NH^+}$ has only one. So the order of stabilisation by solvation runs opposite to the inductive order — it favours the primary cation. Steric bulk reinforces this: small groups like $\ce{-CH3}$ pose no obstruction, but bigger groups crowd the nitrogen and hinder both protonation and H-bonding.
In water the three factors pull in different directions. The $+I$ effect favours more alkyl substitution; solvation and steric hindrance penalise it. The observed aqueous order is the net of this "subtle interplay" (NCERT).
The NCERT Aqueous Orders
NCERT does not leave the outcome to inference — it states the resolved aqueous orders verbatim. These two lines are worth memorising exactly, because they differ between the methyl and ethyl series:
$$\ce{(CH3)2NH > CH3NH2 > (CH3)3N > NH3}$$ $$\ce{(C2H5)2NH > (C2H5)3N > C2H5NH2 > NH3}$$
| Series | Observed aqueous order (strong → weak) | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Gas phase (any series) | $\ce{3^\circ > 2^\circ > 1^\circ > NH3}$ | pure $+I$ effect |
| Methyl, aqueous | $\ce{(CH3)2NH > CH3NH2 > (CH3)3N > NH3}$ | 3° drops below 1° |
| Ethyl, aqueous | $\ce{(C2H5)2NH > (C2H5)3N > C2H5NH2 > NH3}$ | 3° rises above 1° |
In both aqueous series the secondary amine is the strongest base, because it strikes the best balance — enough alkyl groups for a useful $+I$ push, yet still two N–H bonds for solvation and not too much steric crowding. The placement of the tertiary amine is what shifts between the series. The change of the alkyl group "from $\ce{-CH3}$ to $\ce{-C2H5}$ results in change of the order of basic strength", as NCERT puts it. Do not assume one fixed order across both series.
Methyl and ethyl tertiary amines sit in different places
In the methyl series the tertiary amine $\ce{(CH3)3N}$ is the weakest of the three alkyl amines (it even falls below the primary). In the ethyl series the tertiary amine $\ce{(C2H5)3N}$ jumps above the primary $\ce{C2H5NH2}$. NIOS gives the safe general statement: "An aliphatic secondary amine is more basic than primary and tertiary amines." Lead with the secondary amine and you will rarely go wrong.
Rule: 2° is strongest in water for both series; the exact slot of 3° depends on whether the groups are methyl or ethyl.
Aromatic Amines and the Aniline Anomaly
Aniline ($pK_b = 9.38$) is a far weaker base than ammonia ($pK_b = 4.75$), let alone methylamine ($pK_b = 3.38$). NCERT asks the question directly — "pKb value of aniline is quite high. Why is it so?" — and answers with resonance. Because the $\ce{-NH2}$ is bonded directly to the ring, the nitrogen lone pair "is in conjugation with the benzene ring and thus making it less available for protonation."
The accounting is by resonance structures. Aniline is a resonance hybrid of five structures (the neutral form plus four that push the lone pair into the ortho and para positions). The anilinium ion formed on protonation has only two (the Kekulé pair). "Greater the number of resonating structures, greater is the stability." So the free base is more stabilised than its conjugate acid; protonation costs the molecule its delocalisation energy, and "the proton acceptability or the basic nature of aniline ... would be less than that of ammonia."
The nitrogen lone pair conjugates with the ring, building up negative charge at the ortho and para positions and acquiring a partial positive charge on nitrogen. Because the lone pair is tied up in this delocalisation, it is far less available to bond a proton — aniline is a weak base. (The same delocalisation makes $\ce{-NH2}$ a powerful ortho/para-directing activator in electrophilic substitution.)
The contrast with benzylamine ($\ce{C6H5CH2NH2}$, $pK_b = 4.70$) makes the point. Here a $\ce{-CH2-}$ spacer separates the nitrogen from the ring, so there is no conjugation; the lone pair stays localised and available, and benzylamine is comparable to ammonia and far more basic than aniline. NCERT's increasing order is $\ce{C6H5NH2 < C6H5CH2NH2}$.
Substituents on Aniline
Once aniline is the baseline, ring substituents shift basicity in a predictable direction. NCERT states it directly: in substituted aniline "electron releasing groups like $\ce{-OCH3}$, $\ce{-CH3}$ increase basic strength whereas electron withdrawing groups like $\ce{-NO2}$, $\ce{-SO3H}$, $\ce{-COOH}$, $\ce{-X}$ decrease it."
| Substituent type | Examples | Effect on N lone pair | Basicity vs aniline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electron-donating (EDG) | $\ce{-OCH3}$, $\ce{-CH3}$ | raises ring/N electron density | Increased (stronger base) |
| Electron-withdrawing (EWG) | $\ce{-NO2}$, $\ce{-SO3H}$, $\ce{-COOH}$, $\ce{-X}$ | drains electron density | Decreased (weaker base) |
The headline case is the nitro group. A $\ce{-NO2}$ group withdraws electrons by both $-I$ and $-M$ (resonance), so p-nitroaniline is markedly weaker than aniline, which is in turn weaker than p-toluidine ($p$-$\ce{CH3}$-aniline). The para position lets the $-NO2$ conjugate directly with the nitrogen lone pair, deepening the effect. The NCERT-style increasing order of basic strength is therefore:
$$\text{p-nitroaniline} < \text{aniline} < \text{p-toluidine}$$
Halogens decrease aniline basicity even though they are o/p-directors
In electrophilic substitution, halogens are weakly activating, o/p-directing groups. For basicity, NCERT lists $\ce{-X}$ among the electron-withdrawing groups that decrease basic strength. The dominant effect on the nitrogen lone pair is the halogen's $-I$ pull, so a halo-aniline is a weaker base than aniline. Do not transfer the "activating" label from one context to the other.
Rule: for aniline basicity, $\ce{-NO2}$, $\ce{-SO3H}$, $\ce{-COOH}$ and $\ce{-X}$ all lower it; only EDGs like $\ce{-CH3}$, $\ce{-OCH3}$ raise it.
Worked Basicity-Ordering Examples
Ordering questions reward a fixed routine: separate aromatic from aliphatic (aliphatic wins, ammonia sits between them), then rank within each block using the rules above.
Arrange in decreasing order of basic strength: $\ce{C6H5NH2}$, $\ce{C2H5NH2}$, $\ce{(C2H5)2NH}$, $\ce{NH3}$.
Aliphatic amines beat ammonia; aniline (aromatic, delocalised lone pair) is the weakest of all. Within the ethyl aliphatics, the secondary amine outranks the primary. This is NCERT Example 9.4 verbatim:
$$\ce{(C2H5)2NH > C2H5NH2 > NH3 > C6H5NH2}$$
Arrange in increasing order of basic strength: aniline, p-nitroaniline, p-toluidine.
All three are anilines, so compare substituents only. The EWG $\ce{-NO2}$ lowers basicity below aniline; the EDG $\ce{-CH3}$ raises it above aniline.
$$\text{p-nitroaniline} < \text{aniline} < \text{p-toluidine}$$
Increasing order of basic strength: $\ce{C2H5NH2}$, $\ce{C6H5NH2}$, $\ce{NH3}$, $\ce{C6H5CH2NH2}$, $\ce{(C2H5)2NH}$ (NCERT intext 9.4).
Aniline is weakest (delocalised lone pair). Ammonia comes next. Benzylamine has a localised lone pair, slightly stronger than ammonia. Then the ethyl aliphatics, with the secondary strongest. The NCERT answer is:
$$\ce{C6H5NH2 < NH3 < C6H5CH2NH2 < C2H5NH2 < (C2H5)2NH}$$
Basicity of Amines in one screen
- Amines are bases because nitrogen donates its unshared lone pair (Lewis & Brønsted base).
- Lower $pK_b$ (higher $K_b$) means a stronger base. $\ce{NH3}$: $pK_b = 4.75$; aliphatic amines $\approx 3$; aniline $9.38$.
- The $+I$ effect of alkyl groups makes aliphatic amines stronger than ammonia.
- Gas phase (inductive only): $\ce{3^\circ > 2^\circ > 1^\circ > NH3}$.
- Aqueous (interplay of $+I$, solvation, sterics): $\ce{(CH3)2NH > CH3NH2 > (CH3)3N > NH3}$ and $\ce{(C2H5)2NH > (C2H5)3N > C2H5NH2 > NH3}$. The 2° amine is strongest in water.
- Aniline is a weak base: its lone pair is delocalised into the ring (5 resonance forms vs 2 for anilinium).
- On aniline: EDGs ($\ce{-CH3}$, $\ce{-OCH3}$) raise basicity; EWGs ($\ce{-NO2}$, $\ce{-SO3H}$, $\ce{-COOH}$, $\ce{-X}$) lower it. p-Nitroaniline is much weaker than aniline.