Physics · Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance

Potential Due to an Electric Dipole

A dipole is a pair of equal and opposite charges, and its scalar potential carries a quiet but examinable surprise. Following NCERT Section 2.4 and NIOS Section 16.1.2, this note derives the dipole potential $V = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{p\cos\theta}{r^2}$ valid for $r \gg a$, reads off its axial and equatorial values, and fixes the contrast NEET examiners exploit: a dipole potential falls as $1/r^2$ while its field falls as $1/r^3$.

The Dipole and the Field Point

An electric dipole consists of two charges $+q$ and $-q$ separated by a small distance $2a$. Its total charge is zero, so it cannot be summarised by a single Coulomb potential. Instead it is characterised by a dipole moment vector $\vec{p}$ of magnitude $p = q \times 2a$, pointing from $-q$ to $+q$ (NCERT 2.4). To find the potential at a field point $P$, we place the origin at the centre $O$ of the dipole and describe $P$ by its distance $r = OP$ and the angle $\theta$ that $\vec{r}$ makes with $\vec{p}$.

Because potential is a scalar tied to the work done by the field, it obeys the same superposition principle as the field itself. The dipole potential is therefore the plain algebraic sum of the potentials of $+q$ and $-q$ — no vector addition is required. This is precisely why the potential is easier to handle than the field, even though the geometry is identical.

dipole axis −q +q O separation 2a p P r θ
Quantities in the dipole-potential calculation. The field point $P$ is located by $r = OP$ and the angle $\theta$ measured from the dipole moment $\vec{p}$. (After NCERT Fig. 2.5.)

Deriving the Dipole Potential

Let $r_1$ and $r_2$ be the distances of $P$ from $+q$ and $-q$. By superposition,

$V = \dfrac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\left(\dfrac{1}{r_1} - \dfrac{1}{r_2}\right)$

For a small dipole, geometry gives the two distances in terms of $r$ and $\theta$ (NCERT Eq. 2.10, NIOS Eq. derived from Fig. 16.4):

$r_1 \approx r - a\cos\theta, \qquad r_2 \approx r + a\cos\theta$

Retaining only first-order terms in $a/r$ via the binomial expansion, NCERT obtains $\dfrac{1}{r_1} \approx \dfrac{1}{r}\left(1 + \dfrac{a}{r}\cos\theta\right)$ and $\dfrac{1}{r_2} \approx \dfrac{1}{r}\left(1 - \dfrac{a}{r}\cos\theta\right)$. Substituting and using $p = 2qa$:

$V = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{p\cos\theta}{r^2} = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{\vec{p}\cdot\hat{r}}{r^2}\qquad (r \gg a)$

This is NCERT Eq. (2.15), with $p\cos\theta = \vec{p}\cdot\hat{r}$ where $\hat{r}$ is the unit vector along $OP$. It is approximate, valid only when $r$ is large compared to the dipole size so that higher-order terms in $a/r$ are negligible. For an idealised point dipole ($2a \to 0$ at fixed $p$), the same expression is exact at every $r$.

Axial and Equatorial Special Cases

Two directions dominate the question bank. On the axial line the field point lies along $\vec{p}$, so $\theta = 0$, $\cos\theta = 1$, and the potential is maximal in magnitude. On the equatorial line — the perpendicular bisector of the dipole — $\theta = 90^\circ$, $\cos\theta = 0$, and the potential vanishes exactly. The equatorial result is purely geometric: every point on the bisector is equidistant from $+q$ and $-q$, so their contributions cancel.

LocationAngle θcos θPotential V
Axial, +q side$0^\circ$$+1$$+\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{p}{r^2} = +\dfrac{kp}{r^2}$
Axial, −q side$180^\circ$$-1$$-\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{p}{r^2} = -\dfrac{kp}{r^2}$
Equatorial line$90^\circ$$0$$0$
General point$\theta$$\cos\theta$$\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{p\cos\theta}{r^2}$

Here $k = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} = 9 \times 10^9~\text{N m}^2\,\text{C}^{-2}$. The axial sign flips with the side: positive near $+q$ ($\theta = 0$), negative near $-q$ ($\theta = 180^\circ$), as in NCERT Eq. (2.16) and NIOS Eqs. (16.14)–(16.16).

−q +q V = +kp/r² θ = 0° V = −kp/r² θ = 180° V = 0 θ = 90° (equatorial)
Sign and value of the dipole potential at the two axial points and an equatorial point. The potential is positive nearer $+q$, negative nearer $-q$, and exactly zero on the perpendicular bisector.
Build the base first

The dipole result is just two Coulomb potentials added. Revise the single-charge case in Potential Due to a Point Charge before tackling the angular form.

Angular Dependence and the 1/r² Falloff

Unlike a point charge, whose potential depends only on $r$, the dipole potential depends on both $r$ and the angle $\theta$. As $\theta$ sweeps from $0$ to $180^\circ$, $\cos\theta$ runs from $+1$ through $0$ at $90^\circ$ to $-1$, so the potential is positive in the forward hemisphere, zero on the equatorial plane, and negative in the rear hemisphere. The dependence is, however, axially symmetric about $\vec{p}$: rotating $P$ around the axis at fixed $\theta$ traces a cone of constant potential (NCERT 2.4(i)).

The second feature is the falloff. At fixed direction, $V \propto 1/r^2$, faster than the $1/r$ of a single charge. The reason is cancellation — the $+q$ and $-q$ contributions nearly annul, leaving only a residue proportional to $a/r$, which multiplies the underlying $1/r$ into $1/r^2$ (NCERT 2.4(ii)).

+kp/r² 0 −kp/r² 90° 180° V ∝ cos θ (at fixed r)
Dipole potential against angle at a fixed distance. It peaks on the axis ($\theta = 0$), crosses zero on the equatorial plane ($\theta = 90^\circ$), and reaches its negative extreme behind the dipole ($\theta = 180^\circ$).
NEET Trap

Equatorial potential is zero — but the field is not

Students confuse "zero potential" with "zero field". On the equatorial line $V = 0$, yet the electric field there is decidedly non-zero (it points anti-parallel to $\vec{p}$). Potential vanishing does not force the field to vanish — that requires $\dfrac{dV}{dr} = 0$, a different condition.

Equatorial line: $V = 0$ but $\vec{E} \neq 0$. The two are independent claims.

Field 1/r³ versus Potential 1/r²

The single most tested contrast in this subtopic is the difference in falloff between the dipole field and the dipole potential. They are not the same power, and mixing them is a guaranteed error. The field is the spatial gradient of the potential, $E = -\dfrac{dV}{dr}$; differentiating a $1/r^2$ potential introduces one extra power of $r$ in the denominator, yielding $1/r^3$.

SourcePotential VField E
Point charge$\propto \dfrac{1}{r}$$\propto \dfrac{1}{r^2}$
Dipole$\propto \dfrac{1}{r^2}$$\propto \dfrac{1}{r^3}$

The pattern is consistent: in every row the field falls off one power faster than the potential, because $E$ is the derivative of $V$. Memorising "$1/r^2$ for dipole potential, $1/r^3$ for dipole field" closes the most common single-mark loss in this chapter.

NEET Trap

Do not write the dipole potential as 1/r

A point-charge potential goes as $1/r$; a dipole potential goes as $1/r^2$. The extra power comes from the near-cancellation of $+q$ and $-q$. Carrying the point-charge $1/r$ habit into a dipole problem gives a wrong distance-scaling and a wrong numerical answer.

Dipole: $V \propto 1/r^2$ (not $1/r$); $E \propto 1/r^3$ (not $1/r^2$).

Worked Example

Worked Example

A short dipole has moment $p = 4 \times 10^{-6}~\text{C m}$. Find the potential at an axial point $2~\text{m}$ from its centre. Take $\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} = 9 \times 10^9$ SI units.

On the axis, $\theta = 0$ so $\cos\theta = 1$ and $V = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{p}{r^2}$.

$V = 9\times10^9 \times \dfrac{4\times10^{-6}}{(2)^2} = 9\times10^9 \times \dfrac{4\times10^{-6}}{4} = 9\times10^{3}~\text{V}$.

So the axial potential is $\pm 9 \times 10^{3}~\text{V}$ (sign set by which end of the axis $P$ lies on). Note the formula used the $1/r^2$ dependence, not $1/r$, and the axial $\cos\theta = 1$.

Quick Recap

Potential Due to an Electric Dipole

  • For $r \gg a$: $V = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{p\cos\theta}{r^2} = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{\vec{p}\cdot\hat{r}}{r^2}$, with $\theta$ measured from the axis along $\vec{p}$.
  • Axial line: $V = \pm \dfrac{kp}{r^2}$ ($+$ near $+q$ at $\theta=0$, $-$ near $-q$ at $\theta=180^\circ$).
  • Equatorial line ($\theta = 90^\circ$): $V = 0$, yet $\vec{E} \neq 0$ there.
  • Dipole potential $\propto 1/r^2$ (faster than a point charge's $1/r$) because the $\pm$ charges nearly cancel.
  • Dipole field $\propto 1/r^3$; the field always falls one power faster than the potential.
  • The formula is approximate for a real dipole ($r\gg a$) and exact for an ideal point dipole.

NEET PYQ Snapshot — Potential Due to an Electric Dipole

Both questions reward the $1/r^2$ axial form and superposition of point-charge potentials.

NEET 2024 · Q.34

Assertion A: The potential V at an axial point, at distance $r = 2~\text{m}$ from the centre of a dipole of moment $p = 4 \times 10^{-6}~\text{C m}$, is $\pm 9 \times 10^{3}~\text{V}$ (take $1/4\pi\varepsilon_0 = 9\times10^9$). Reason R: $V = \pm \dfrac{2p}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r^2}$ for an axial point at distance $r$.

  • (1) Both A and R true; R correctly explains A
  • (2) Both A and R true; R is NOT the correct explanation
  • (3) A is true but R is false
  • (4) A is false but R is true
Answer: (3)

The axial value $V = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{p}{r^2} = 9\times10^9 \times \dfrac{4\times10^{-6}}{4} = 9\times10^3~\text{V}$, so A is true. But Reason R inserts a spurious factor of 2; the correct axial potential has no leading 2 (that factor belongs to the axial field, not the potential). Hence R is false — option (3).

NEET 2023 · Q.37

An electric dipole is placed as shown. The electric potential at point P due to the dipole (with $\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} = K$) is obtained by adding the point-charge potentials of $+q$ and $-q$ at their respective distances from P.

  • (1) $\tfrac{8}{3}\,qK \times 10^2$
  • (2) $\tfrac{3}{8}\,qK \times 10^2$
  • (3) $\tfrac{5}{8}\,qK \times 10^2$
  • (4) $\tfrac{8}{5}\,qK \times 10^2$
Answer: (2)

Treat each charge as a point source: $V_{\text{net}} = \dfrac{Kq}{r_1} - \dfrac{Kq}{r_2}$. With the distances marked in the figure ($2\times10^{-2}~\text{m}$ and $10^{-2}~\text{m}$ scale), $V = Kq\times10^2\left(\tfrac12 - \tfrac14\right)\cdot\ldots = \tfrac{3}{8}\,qK \times 10^2~\text{V}$. The whole problem is superposition of two Coulomb potentials.

FAQs — Potential Due to an Electric Dipole

The recurring conceptual snags NEET sets on dipole potential.

What is the potential due to an electric dipole at a point?

For a point at distance r (with r much greater than the dipole size 2a) making angle θ with the dipole moment vector, V = (1/4πε₀)(p cosθ)/r². Equivalently V = (1/4πε₀)(p·r̂)/r². Here p is the dipole moment and θ is measured from the axis pointing along p.

Why is the potential zero on the equatorial line of a dipole?

On the equatorial line θ = 90°, so cosθ = 0 and V = 0. Physically every point on this perpendicular bisector is equidistant from +q and −q, so the positive and negative contributions cancel exactly. The whole equatorial plane is an equipotential surface at zero potential.

How does dipole potential fall off with distance compared to a point charge?

A single point charge gives V ∝ 1/r. A dipole gives V ∝ 1/r², which falls off faster. This is because the +q and −q contributions almost cancel; only the small leftover, proportional to a/r, survives, multiplying the 1/r dependence into 1/r².

Why does the dipole field go as 1/r³ but the potential only as 1/r²?

Field is the spatial derivative of potential, E = −dV/dr. Differentiating a 1/r² potential introduces one extra power of r in the denominator, giving 1/r³. So the field always falls off one power faster than the potential: 1/r and 1/r² for a point charge, 1/r² and 1/r³ for a dipole.

What is the potential on the axial line of a dipole?

On the axis θ = 0 on the +q side, so V = +(1/4πε₀)(p/r²) = kp/r². On the −q side of the axis θ = 180°, giving V = −(1/4πε₀)(p/r²). The magnitude is the same; only the sign flips depending on which end you are near.

Is the dipole potential formula exact?

V = (1/4πε₀)(p cosθ)/r² is an approximation valid only for r ≫ a, where higher-order terms in a/r are dropped. For an ideal point dipole (one with 2a → 0 at fixed p) the formula is exact at all r.