Physics · Electromagnetic Induction

Mutual Inductance

When the current in one coil changes, it can drive an emf in a second coil placed nearby, without any wire joining them. NCERT §6.7.1 measures the strength of this coupling by a single constant — the mutual inductance $M$ — defined through $N_1\Phi_1 = M_{12} I_2$ and the induced emf $\varepsilon = -M\,\dfrac{dI}{dt}$. For NEET this subtopic feeds directly into transformer ideas and is a frequent source of proportionality and reciprocity questions.

What Is Mutual Inductance

Take two coils placed close to one another. Send a current $I_2$ through the second coil. The magnetic field it produces threads the first coil and sets up a flux there. NCERT denotes the flux through the first coil by $\Phi_1$, so that the total flux linkage with the first coil — flux per turn times the number of turns $N_1$ — is proportional to the current that produced it:

$$N_1 \Phi_1 = M_{12}\, I_2$$

The constant $M_{12}$ is the mutual inductance of coil 1 with respect to coil 2, also called the coefficient of mutual induction. It depends only on how the two coils are built and placed, never on the size of the current. The figure below shows the coupling: current in the outer (driving) coil, flux spilling through the inner (pickup) coil.

Figure 1 Coil 2 — carries I₂ Coil 1 — pickup shared flux Φ₁

Current $I_2$ in coil 2 generates a field whose flux $\Phi_1$ threads coil 1. The flux linkage $N_1\Phi_1$ is proportional to $I_2$, with proportionality constant $M_{12}$.

The emf Induced Through Coupling

Mutual inductance becomes physically visible only when the current changes. NCERT recalls Experiment 6.3, in which an emf appeared in coil C1 whenever the current in coil C2 changed. Starting from $N_1\Phi_1 = M I_2$ and differentiating with respect to time, then applying Faraday's law $\varepsilon_1 = -\dfrac{d(N_1\Phi_1)}{dt}$, gives the working equation:

$$\varepsilon_1 = -\,M\,\frac{dI_2}{dt}$$

A varying current in one coil induces an emf in the neighbouring coil. The magnitude of that emf depends on two things only — the rate of change of current and the mutual inductance. The negative sign is the signature of Lenz's law: the induced emf opposes the change of flux that caused it. A steady current ($dI/dt = 0$) induces nothing.

Worked Example

A pair of adjacent coils has a mutual inductance of $1.5\ \text{H}$. If the current in one coil changes from $0$ to $20\ \text{A}$ in $0.5\ \text{s}$, what is the change of flux linkage with the other coil? (NCERT)

The flux linkage with the second coil is $N_2\Phi_2 = M\,I_1$. The change in linkage is therefore

$$\Delta(N_2\Phi_2) = M\,\Delta I_1 = 1.5 \times (20 - 0) = 30\ \text{Wb}.$$

The flux linkage changes by $30\ \text{Wb}$ (weber-turns). Dividing by the time, the average induced emf would be $30 / 0.5 = 60\ \text{V}$, though the question asks only for the change in linkage.

M of Two Coaxial Solenoids

The standard model NCERT solves is two long coaxial solenoids of equal length $l$. The inner solenoid S1 has radius $r_1$ and $n_1$ turns per unit length; the outer solenoid S2 has radius $r_2$ and $n_2$ turns per unit length. Pass a current $I_2$ through S2. Inside a long solenoid the field is uniform, $B = \mu_0 n_2 I_2$, so the flux linking the $n_1 l$ turns of S1 is $N_1\Phi_1 = (n_1 l)(\mu_0 n_2 I_2)(\pi r_1^2)$. Comparing with $N_1\Phi_1 = M_{12}I_2$:

$$M = M_{12} = \mu_0\, n_1 n_2\, \pi r_1^{\,2}\, l = \mu_0\, n_1 n_2\, A\, l$$

where $A = \pi r_1^2$ is the cross-sectional area of the inner solenoid — the field outside it is taken as negligible, so the area that matters is the inner one. The derivation neglects edge effects, valid because the solenoids are long ($l \gg r_2$).

Figure 2 length l (common) r₁ r₂ outer S₂: n₂ turns/length inner S₁: n₁ turns/length, area A = πr₁²

Two long coaxial solenoids of common length $l$. The mutual inductance uses the inner area $A = \pi r_1^2$, giving $M = \mu_0 n_1 n_2 \pi r_1^2 l$.

If the space between the windings is filled with a magnetic medium of relative permeability $\mu_r$ instead of air, every flux value scales up by $\mu_r$, so the mutual inductance becomes $M = \mu_r\,\mu_0\, n_1 n_2\, \pi r_1^2\, l$. This is exactly why transformers use iron cores — a large $\mu_r$ multiplies the coupling between primary and secondary.

Build the foundation

Mutual inductance is the two-coil cousin of a single coil's self-inductance — same henry, same opposition to change, but flux from the coil's own current. Read that first if $L$ is unfamiliar.

Reciprocity: M12 = M21

Now reverse the roles. Pass a current $I_1$ through the inner solenoid S1 and ask for the flux linkage it produces in S2, defined by $N_2\Phi_2 = M_{21}I_1$. Because the flux of a long solenoid is confined essentially inside it, the same algebra runs again and yields $M_{21} = \mu_0 n_1 n_2 \pi r_1^2 l$ — an identical expression. Hence:

$$M_{12} = M_{21} = M$$

NCERT stresses that this reciprocity is far more general than the solenoid example used to demonstrate it: for any pair of coils there is a single mutual inductance, independent of which one carries the current. The practical value is computational. If the inner solenoid is much shorter than the outer one, $M_{12}$ is easy to find (the short coil sits in a uniform field) while $M_{21}$ would be extremely hard (the inner coil's field varies across the long outer coil). The equality lets you compute the easy one and assert the other.

NEET Trap

$M_{12} = M_{21}$, but $M$ still depends on geometry and coupling

Students misread reciprocity two ways. First, they think $M_{12} = M_{21}$ means the two coils are "interchangeable" — they are not; only the single number $M$ is shared. Second, they assume $M$ is a fixed material constant. It is not: $M$ changes with the number of turns, the cross-sectional area, the length, the medium ($\mu_r$), and crucially the separation and relative orientation of the coils. Slide the coils apart or tilt one, and $M$ falls even though $M_{12} = M_{21}$ stays true.

$M_{12} = M_{21}$ is always true. $M$ itself is set by geometry, medium and coupling — never by the current.

What M Depends On

Collecting the dependencies from NCERT into one place clarifies which knob moves $M$ in a problem. The current is conspicuously absent — $M$ is a structural property of the coil pair.

FactorEffect on MSource relation
Turns per unit length $n_1, n_2$$M \propto n_1 n_2$M = μ₀ n₁ n₂ π r₁² l
Inner area $A = \pi r_1^2$$M \propto A$Flux uses inner area
Common length $l$$M \propto l$More linked turns
Magnetic medium $\mu_r$$M \propto \mu_r$M = μ_r μ₀ n₁ n₂ π r₁² l
Separation & orientation$M$ falls as coupling weakensNCERT: depends on separation and relative orientation
The current $I$No effect$M$ is structural
Worked Example

Two concentric circular coils, one of small radius $r_1$ and the other of large radius $r_2$, with $r_1 \ll r_2$, are placed coaxially with centres coinciding. Find the mutual inductance. (NCERT Example 6.8)

Let current $I_2$ flow in the large coil. The field at its centre is $B_2 = \dfrac{\mu_0 I_2}{2 r_2}$. Since $r_1 \ll r_2$, this field is nearly uniform over the small coil, so the flux through it is

$$\Phi_1 = \pi r_1^2 B_2 = \frac{\mu_0 \pi r_1^2}{2 r_2}\, I_2 = M_{12}\, I_2.$$

Therefore $M = \dfrac{\mu_0 \pi r_1^2}{2 r_2}$, and by reciprocity $M_{12} = M_{21}$. This single-turn result is the one the NEET 2021 PYQ below tests.

The Henry

Inductance is a scalar with dimensions $[\text{M L}^2\text{T}^{-2}\text{A}^{-2}]$ — flux divided by current. Its SI unit is the henry (H), named for Joseph Henry, who discovered electromagnetic induction in the USA independently of Faraday in England. From $N\Phi = MI$ one henry equals one weber per ampere; equivalently, from $\varepsilon = -M\,dI/dt$, a coil pair has $M = 1\ \text{H}$ if a current changing at $1\ \text{A s}^{-1}$ induces $1\ \text{V}$.

Quick Recap

Mutual Inductance in One Screen

  • Definition: $N_1\Phi_1 = M_{12} I_2$ — flux linkage in one coil per unit current in the other.
  • Induced emf: $\varepsilon = -M\,\dfrac{dI}{dt}$; magnitude set by $M$ and the rate of change of current.
  • Coaxial solenoids: $M = \mu_0 n_1 n_2 A l$, using the inner area $A = \pi r_1^2$; with a core, multiply by $\mu_r$.
  • Reciprocity: $M_{12} = M_{21} = M$ for any coil pair.
  • Concentric loops: $M = \dfrac{\mu_0 \pi r_1^2}{2 r_2}$, so $M \propto r_1^2 / r_2$.
  • Depends on: turns, area, length, medium, separation, orientation — never the current. Unit: henry.

NEET PYQ Snapshot — Mutual Inductance

Real NEET items on coupled coils and mutual inductance, with worked reasoning.

NEET 2021

Two conducting circular loops of radii $R_1$ and $R_2$ are placed in the same plane with their centres coinciding. If $R_1 \gg R_2$, the mutual inductance $M$ between them is directly proportional to:

  • (1) $R_2^2 / R_1$
  • (2) $R_1 / R_2$
  • (3) $R_1^2 / R_2$
  • (4) $R_1 R_2$
Answer: (1) $R_2^2 / R_1$

Let current $i$ flow in the large loop. Field at the common centre is $B = \dfrac{\mu_0 i}{2 R_1}$. Since $R_2 \ll R_1$, this is nearly uniform over the small loop, so $\Phi = B \times \pi R_2^2 = \dfrac{\mu_0 \pi R_2^2}{2 R_1}\, i$. From $\Phi = Mi$, $M = \dfrac{\mu_0 \pi}{2}\dfrac{R_2^2}{R_1}$, hence $M \propto \dfrac{R_2^2}{R_1}$.

NEET 2024

A strong bar magnet moves towards solenoid-2 from solenoid-1. The direction of the induced current in solenoid-1 and in solenoid-2, respectively, are along the directions:

  • (1) AB and DC
  • (2) BA and CD
  • (3) AB and CD
  • (4) BA and DC
Answer: (1) AB and DC

The two solenoids are flux-coupled. By Lenz's law each solenoid develops an induced current that opposes the change in flux caused by the approaching magnet — the face nearest the oncoming pole is repelled, the receding side is attracted — fixing the senses as AB in solenoid-1 and DC in solenoid-2. This is the directional companion to the quantitative coupling captured by $M$.

FAQs — Mutual Inductance

Frequent doubts on coupling, reciprocity and the henry, answered from NCERT §6.7.1.

What is mutual inductance?

Mutual inductance is the property of a pair of coils by which a changing current in one coil induces an emf in the other. If a current I2 in coil 2 produces a flux linkage N1Φ1 in coil 1, then N1Φ1 = M12 I2, where M12 is the mutual inductance of coil 1 with respect to coil 2. It is also called the coefficient of mutual induction.

What is the SI unit of mutual inductance?

The SI unit of mutual inductance is the henry (H), named after Joseph Henry. One henry equals one weber per ampere, or equivalently one volt-second per ampere. From ε = −M dI/dt, a coil pair has M = 1 H if a current changing at 1 A per second induces an emf of 1 volt.

Why is M12 equal to M21?

For two long coaxial solenoids both calculations give M12 = μ0 n1 n2 π r1² l and M21 = μ0 n1 n2 π r1² l, so M12 = M21 = M. This reciprocity is general: the mutual inductance of a pair of coils is a single number independent of which coil carries the current. NCERT notes the equality is especially useful when one of the two flux linkages is hard to compute directly.

On what factors does mutual inductance depend?

Mutual inductance depends on the geometry of the two coils — their number of turns, cross-sectional area and length — on the magnetic medium between them (it is multiplied by the relative permeability μr if a magnetic core is present), and on their separation and relative orientation. It does not depend on the current itself.

What is the mutual inductance of two coaxial solenoids?

For two long coaxial solenoids of length l, with the inner solenoid of radius r1 carrying n1 turns per unit length inside an outer one with n2 turns per unit length, M = μ0 n1 n2 π r1² l. With a medium of relative permeability μr present, M = μr μ0 n1 n2 π r1² l. The area A = π r1² is that of the inner solenoid.

How does mutual inductance relate to induced emf?

A current I2 changing in coil 2 induces an emf in coil 1 given by ε1 = −M dI2/dt. The magnitude of the induced emf depends on the rate of change of current and on the mutual inductance of the two coils. The negative sign reflects Lenz's law: the induced emf opposes the change in flux.