Why the wave theory fails
By the end of the nineteenth century the wave picture of light was firmly established: interference, diffraction and polarisation all followed naturally if light is an electromagnetic wave with energy spread continuously over the wavefront. NCERT §11.5 asks the decisive question — can this same wave picture account for the photoelectric effect? On three counts it cannot.
In the wave picture the energy a surface electron absorbs grows with the intensity, because intensity sets the amplitude of the electric and magnetic fields. The maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons should therefore rise with intensity, and a beam of any frequency, if intense enough and given enough time, should eventually free electrons. There would be no threshold frequency at all. Both predictions contradict experiment.
The wave picture also fails on timing. Energy is absorbed continuously across the whole wavefront, shared among an enormous number of electrons, so the energy delivered to one electron per unit time is tiny. Explicit estimates give hours before a single electron accumulates enough energy to escape — yet emission is observed to be instantaneous.
| Observation | Wave theory predicts | Experiment shows |
|---|---|---|
| Effect of intensity on $K_{\max}$ | $K_{\max}$ increases with intensity | $K_{\max}$ independent of intensity |
| Threshold frequency | None — any frequency works if intense enough | Sharp cut-off frequency $\nu_0$ exists |
| Time lag before emission | Hours for a dim source | Instantaneous ($\sim 10^{-9}\,$s or less) |
The photon hypothesis
Einstein's resolution, set out in NCERT §11.6 and NIOS §25.2, was to abandon continuous absorption. Radiation energy is built up of discrete units — quanta — each carrying energy $E = h\nu$, where $h$ is Planck's constant and $\nu$ the frequency of the light. In the photoelectric process a single electron absorbs a single quantum. The whole quantum is either taken in or it is not; there is no gradual accumulation.
This single move reinterprets intensity. The intensity of monochromatic light is fixed by the number of quanta arriving per unit area per unit time, not by the energy of each quantum. Two beams of the same frequency but different intensity deliver photons of identical energy $h\nu$; the brighter beam simply delivers more of them per second.
The energy of one absorbed photon splits into a fixed escape cost $\varphi_0$ and whatever remains as kinetic energy. The most loosely bound electron keeps the maximum, $K_{\max}$.
The photoelectric equation
An electron at the surface must first pay the work function $\varphi_0$ — the minimum energy needed to escape the metal — before any energy is left over as motion. If the absorbed quantum exceeds this cost, the electron emerges. The most loosely bound electrons keep the largest share, so their maximum kinetic energy is
$$K_{\max} = h\nu - \varphi_0$$
This is Einstein's photoelectric equation (NCERT Eq. 11.2). More tightly bound electrons emerge with less than $K_{\max}$, because they lose extra energy escaping or in internal collisions. NIOS writes the same statement as $h\nu = \varphi_0 + K_{\max}$, a direct expression of energy conservation for the absorption of one photon by one electron.
$K_{\max}$ tracks frequency, never intensity
A common error is to assume that brighter light gives faster photoelectrons. In Einstein's picture each electron absorbs exactly one photon of energy $h\nu$, so $K_{\max} = h\nu - \varphi_0$ is set by frequency alone. Doubling the intensity at the same frequency doubles the number of photons, doubling the photocurrent — but $K_{\max}$ and the stopping potential are unchanged.
Rule: Frequency controls $K_{\max}$ and $V_0$; intensity controls the number of photoelectrons (the current).
Threshold frequency
Kinetic energy cannot be negative, so emission is only possible when the photon energy exceeds the work function: $h\nu > \varphi_0$. The boundary case $K_{\max} = 0$ defines the smallest frequency that can free an electron. Setting $h\nu_0 = \varphi_0$ gives the threshold frequency (NCERT Eq. 11.3):
$$\nu_0 = \frac{\varphi_0}{h}$$
Below $\nu_0$ no photoelectrons are emitted no matter how intense the radiation or how long it falls on the surface, because no single photon carries enough energy. The threshold is a property of the metal: the greater the work function, the higher $\nu_0$. NIOS lists representative values — sodium $2.5\,$eV ($\nu_0 = 6.07\times10^{14}\,$Hz), potassium $2.3\,$eV ($5.58\times10^{14}\,$Hz), zinc $3.4\,$eV ($8.25\times10^{14}\,$Hz). Substituting $\varphi_0 = h\nu_0$ also lets the equation be written compactly as $K_{\max} = h(\nu - \nu_0)$.
The stopping potential and threshold ideas come straight from the lab graphs. Revisit how they are measured in Experimental Study of the Photoelectric Effect.
Stopping potential and the slope h/e
The stopping potential $V_0$ is the negative collector voltage that just halts the most energetic photoelectron, so the work done against it equals the maximum kinetic energy: $K_{\max} = eV_0$ (NCERT Eq. 11.1; NIOS Eq. 25.1). Substituting into the photoelectric equation gives the experimentally testable form (NCERT Eq. 11.4):
$$eV_0 = h\nu - \varphi_0 \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad V_0 = \frac{h}{e}\,\nu - \frac{\varphi_0}{e}$$
This is the equation of a straight line in the variables $V_0$ and $\nu$. Its slope is $h/e$ and its intercept on the frequency axis is the threshold $\nu_0$. Because $h$ and $e$ are universal constants, the slope is the same for every metal; only the intercept shifts. Millikan measured this slope for sodium and, using the known value of $e$, extracted Planck's constant $h$ — confirming Einstein's equation rather than disproving it as he had set out to do.
Two metals give parallel lines of identical slope $h/e$. The line for the metal with the larger work function (B) is shifted right — its threshold frequency is higher and its intercept on the $V_0$ axis is more negative.
What the equation explains
The single line $K_{\max} = h\nu - \varphi_0$ resolves every observation that defeated the wave theory. NCERT §11.6 lays them out point by point, and they map directly onto the experimental laws.
| Observation | Einstein's explanation |
|---|---|
| $K_{\max}$ depends on $\nu$, not intensity | One electron absorbs one quantum $h\nu$; intensity (number of quanta) is irrelevant to the single-electron process. |
| Threshold frequency $\nu_0$ exists | $K_{\max}\ge 0$ requires $h\nu > \varphi_0$, i.e. $\nu > \nu_0 = \varphi_0/h$. |
| Photocurrent $\propto$ intensity (for $\nu>\nu_0$) | More quanta per second means more electrons absorbing them, so more emission. |
| Emission is instantaneous | Absorption of one quantum by one electron is itself instantaneous; low intensity does not delay it. |
Below $\nu_0$, intensity buys nothing
If the incident frequency is below the threshold, no photoelectrons are emitted regardless of how intense or how prolonged the light is. A frequently set trap halves a frequency that was above threshold so that it falls below $\nu_0$, then doubles the intensity to suggest the current should grow. With $\nu < \nu_0$ the photocurrent is exactly zero — doubling the intensity of sub-threshold light produces no emission.
Rule: First check $\nu$ against $\nu_0$. If $\nu < \nu_0$, the current is zero before intensity is even considered.
Worked examples
The two NCERT examples below pin down the numerical use of the equation: the photon-counting interpretation of intensity, and the threshold-plus-stopping-potential calculation.
Monochromatic light of frequency $6.0\times10^{14}\,$Hz from a laser emits power $2.0\times10^{-3}\,$W. Find (a) the energy of one photon and (b) the number of photons emitted per second.
(a) $E = h\nu = (6.63\times10^{-34})(6.0\times10^{14}) = 3.98\times10^{-19}\,$J.
(b) Power $P = NE$, so $N = P/E = (2.0\times10^{-3})/(3.98\times10^{-19}) = 5.0\times10^{15}$ photons per second. Intensity is literally a photon count rate.
The work function of caesium is $2.14\,$eV. Find (a) its threshold frequency and (b) the wavelength of incident light if the photocurrent is stopped by a stopping potential of $0.60\,$V.
(a) $\nu_0 = \dfrac{\varphi_0}{h} = \dfrac{2.14\times1.6\times10^{-19}}{6.63\times10^{-34}} = 5.16\times10^{14}\,$Hz. Below this, no emission occurs.
(b) From $eV_0 = \dfrac{hc}{\lambda} - \varphi_0$, solve $\lambda = \dfrac{hc}{eV_0 + \varphi_0} = \dfrac{(6.63\times10^{-34})(3\times10^{8})}{(0.60 + 2.14)\times1.6\times10^{-19}} = 454\,$nm.
Einstein's photoelectric equation in one screen
- One electron absorbs one photon of energy $h\nu$: $K_{\max} = h\nu - \varphi_0$.
- Threshold frequency $\nu_0 = \varphi_0/h$; below it no emission occurs at any intensity.
- Stopping potential gives $K_{\max} = eV_0$, so $eV_0 = h\nu - \varphi_0$.
- The $V_0$-versus-$\nu$ graph is a straight line of slope $h/e$, universal for all metals; only the intercept (threshold) changes.
- Frequency sets $K_{\max}$ and $V_0$; intensity sets the photocurrent. Emission is instantaneous ($\sim10^{-9}\,$s).