The statement of Ohm's law
A basic law regarding the flow of currents was discovered by G.S. Ohm in 1828, long before the physical mechanism responsible for the flow of currents was understood. Imagine a conductor through which a current $I$ is flowing, and let $V$ be the potential difference between its ends. Then Ohm's law states that the current is directly proportional to the potential difference, provided physical conditions such as temperature and pressure remain unchanged:
$$V \propto I \qquad \text{or} \qquad V = RI$$
The constant of proportionality $R$ is called the resistance of the conductor. It is the property of a conductor by virtue of which it opposes the flow of current through it. For a metallic conductor obeying this law, a plot of $I$ against $V$ is a straight line through the origin, and the slope of the $V$–$I$ graph is precisely $R$.
For an ohmic conductor the current rises in exact proportion to the applied voltage, so the graph is a straight line through the origin. Because $I = V/R$, the slope of the $I$–$V$ line equals $1/R$; a steeper line means a smaller resistance.
Resistance and the ohm
Rearranging the law gives the defining equation for resistance, $R = V/I$. The SI unit of resistance is the ohm, denoted by the symbol $\Omega$ (read as omega) and defined as
$$1\ \Omega = 1\ \text{V A}^{-1} = \frac{1\ \text{volt}}{1\ \text{ampere}}$$
That is, a conductor has a resistance of one ohm if a potential difference of one volt across it drives a current of one ampere through it. The resistance $R$ depends not only on the material of the conductor but also on its dimensions — its length and cross-sectional area — as we derive next.
Geometry: R = ρL/A
Consider a conductor in the form of a slab of length $L$ and cross-sectional area $A$. Imagine placing two identical such slabs side by side, so the length of the combination is $2L$. The same current $I$ flows through the combination as through either slab, while the potential difference doubles to $2V$. Hence the resistance of the combination is $2V/I = 2R$: doubling the length doubles the resistance. In general, resistance is proportional to length, $R \propto L$.
Now imagine cutting the slab lengthwise into two identical slabs, each of cross-sectional area $A/2$. For the same voltage $V$, the current through each half-slab is $I/2$, so each has resistance $V/(I/2) = 2R$: halving the area doubles the resistance. Therefore resistance is inversely proportional to area, $R \propto 1/A$. Combining the two results,
$$R = \rho\,\frac{L}{A}$$
where the constant of proportionality $\rho$ is the resistivity of the material. Resistivity depends on the nature of the material (and on temperature) but not on the dimensions of the conductor, whereas the resistance of a conductor depends on its dimensions as well as on the material. Rearranged, $\rho = RA/L$, with SI unit ohm-metre ($\Omega\,\text{m}$).
Resistance scales up with the length the current must traverse and down with the cross-sectional area available to it — exactly like a longer, narrower pipe offering more resistance to water flow. The material constant $\rho$ fixes the proportionality.
Microscopic form: j = σE
Ohm's law can be recast in a point-by-point form valid inside the material. Define the current density $j$ as the current per unit area taken normal to the current, $j = I/A$, with SI unit $\text{A m}^{-2}$. Substituting $R = \rho L/A$ into $V = IR$ gives $V = I\rho L/A$. If $E$ is the magnitude of the uniform electric field in a conductor of length $L$, the potential difference across its ends is $V = EL$. Using these,
$$EL = j\,\rho\,L \quad\Rightarrow\quad E = \rho\, j$$
Since $j$ is directed along $E$, this can be written in vector form $\mathbf{E} = \rho\,\mathbf{j}$, or equivalently
$$\mathbf{j} = \sigma\,\mathbf{E}, \qquad \sigma \equiv \frac{1}{\rho}$$
where $\sigma$ is the conductivity of the material, the reciprocal of resistivity, with unit $\text{S m}^{-1}$ (siemens per metre). The relation $\mathbf{j} = \sigma\mathbf{E}$ is the microscopic form of Ohm's law: it states that the current density at every point of a conductor is proportional to the local electric field. NEET frequently tests this form directly through current-density problems.
The constants $\rho$ and $\sigma$ are explained microscopically — in terms of drifting electrons and relaxation time — in Drift Velocity & Resistivity.
Ohmic vs non-ohmic conductors
Most metals obey Ohm's law and the relation between voltage and current is linear; such resistors are called ohmic. Resistors which do not obey Ohm's law are called non-ohmic. Devices such as the vacuum diode, semiconductor diode, and transistors show non-ohmic character — for a semiconductor diode, the $I$–$V$ graph is not linear, and the law fails even at low voltages.
A crucial conceptual point: the equation $V = IR$ merely defines resistance and can be applied to any conducting device, ohmic or not. The assertion that "$V = IR$ is Ohm's law" is not strictly true. Ohm's law is the stronger statement that the $I$–$V$ plot is linear, i.e. that $R$ is independent of $V$. A diode has a perfectly well-defined resistance $V/I$ at any operating point, yet it disobeys Ohm's law because that resistance changes with voltage.
"At constant temperature" is not optional
Ohm's law holds only when physical conditions, especially temperature, remain unchanged. A heated filament draws less current than $V/R_{\text{cold}}$ predicts because its resistance rises with temperature. A bulb's $I$–$V$ curve bends precisely for this reason — it is not a failure of $V=IR$, but a reminder that $R$ itself is temperature-dependent.
Apply $V = IR$ with the resistance at the operating temperature, not the room-temperature value.
Resistors in series
Resistors are in series when joined end-to-end so that the same current passes through all of them. Consider two resistors $R_1$ and $R_2$ in series carrying current $I$ from a battery of voltage $V$. The potential differences across them are $V_1 = IR_1$ and $V_2 = IR_2$, and their sum equals the supply voltage:
$$V = V_1 + V_2 = IR_1 + IR_2$$
If the equivalent resistance is $R_{\text{eq}}$, then $V = IR_{\text{eq}} = I(R_1 + R_2)$, so $R_{\text{eq}} = R_1 + R_2$. Extending to any number of resistors,
$$R_{\text{eq}} = R_1 + R_2 + R_3 + \cdots$$
The equivalent resistance of a series combination is the sum of the individual resistances, and is therefore larger than any single resistor in the chain.
Resistors in parallel
Resistors are in parallel when joined so that the same potential difference $V$ exists across all of them. The main current divides; for two resistors $R_1$ and $R_2$ the branch currents are $I_1 = V/R_1$ and $I_2 = V/R_2$, and the total current is their sum:
$$I = I_1 + I_2 = \frac{V}{R_1} + \frac{V}{R_2}$$
Writing $I = V/R_{\text{eq}}$ and dividing through by $V$ gives the reciprocal-sum rule, which extends to any number of resistors:
$$\frac{1}{R_{\text{eq}}} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} + \frac{1}{R_3} + \cdots$$
The equivalent resistance of a parallel combination is smaller than the smallest individual resistance — adding more parallel branches lowers the resistance and increases the current drawn from the source. This is why home appliances are wired in parallel: each receives the full mains voltage, and the total current rises as more are switched on.
In series the same current threads every resistor and resistances add. In parallel the same voltage sits across every branch and reciprocals add, so the equivalent is always less than the smallest branch.
| Feature | Series | Parallel |
|---|---|---|
| Same quantity in all resistors | Current $I$ | Voltage $V$ |
| What adds up | Voltages: $V = V_1 + V_2 + \cdots$ | Currents: $I = I_1 + I_2 + \cdots$ |
| Equivalent resistance | R_eq = R₁ + R₂ + … | 1/R_eq = 1/R₁ + 1/R₂ + … |
| Compared to individual | Larger than the biggest | Smaller than the smallest |
| Two equal resistors R | $2R$ | $R/2$ |
| Everyday use | Lower voltage to one device | Home appliances, full mains each |
Resistors and capacitors combine in opposite ways
For resistors, the values add in series and the reciprocals add in parallel. For capacitors the rule is exactly reversed — capacitances add in parallel, reciprocals add in series. Mixing these up is a classic NEET slip when a question puts a few resistors next to a few capacitors.
Resistors: series adds $R$, parallel adds $1/R$. Capacitors: the other way round.
Worked examples
In our homes, electricity is supplied at 220 V. Calculate the resistance of a bulb if the current drawn by it is 0.2 A. (NIOS Example 17.1)
By Ohm's law, $R = V/I = 220\ \text{V} / 0.2\ \text{A} = 1100\ \Omega$.
Two copper wires A and B have the same length. The diameter of A is twice that of B. Compare their resistances. (NIOS Example 17.3)
Using $R = \rho L/(\pi r^2)$ with the same $\rho$ and $L$, $R_A/R_B = r_B^2 / r_A^2$. Since $r_A = 2r_B$, we get $R_A/R_B = 1/4$. The resistance of B is four times that of A — a thinner wire offers more resistance.
Find the equivalent resistance between points a and d for a $5\ \Omega$, a parallel pair of $15\ \Omega$ and $3\ \Omega$, and a $7\ \Omega$ resistor, all in a single chain. (NIOS Example 17.6)
The $15\ \Omega$ and $3\ \Omega$ are in parallel: $\dfrac{15 \times 3}{15 + 3} = \dfrac{45}{18} = 2.5\ \Omega$. The $5\ \Omega$, $2.5\ \Omega$ and $7\ \Omega$ are then in series: $R = 5 + 2.5 + 7 = 14.5\ \Omega$.
Ohm's law in one glance
- Ohm's law: $V \propto I$, i.e. $V = IR$, valid at constant temperature and pressure; the $I$–$V$ graph is then a straight line through the origin with slope $1/R$.
- Resistance: $R = V/I$, SI unit ohm, $1\ \Omega = 1\ \text{V A}^{-1}$.
- Geometry: $R = \rho L/A$ — proportional to length, inversely to area; $\rho$ depends on material and temperature, not on dimensions.
- Microscopic form: $\mathbf{j} = \sigma\mathbf{E}$ with $\sigma = 1/\rho$, the conductivity (unit $\text{S m}^{-1}$).
- Series: same current; $R_{\text{eq}} = R_1 + R_2 + \cdots$ (larger than any one).
- Parallel: same voltage; $1/R_{\text{eq}} = 1/R_1 + 1/R_2 + \cdots$ (smaller than the smallest).
- Ohmic vs non-ohmic: metals are ohmic (linear $I$–$V$); diodes and transistors are non-ohmic. $V=IR$ defines $R$ for all of them; Ohm's law asserts $R$ is constant.