Members and Electronic Configuration
Group 13 of the periodic table is headed by boron and comprises five elements studied here: boron ($\ce{B}$), aluminium ($\ce{Al}$), gallium ($\ce{Ga}$), indium ($\ce{In}$) and thallium ($\ce{Tl}$). The synthetically prepared radioactive element nihonium ($\ce{Nh}$, $Z=113$) also belongs to the group, but its chemistry is not established and it is left out of property discussions. The family spans the full metallic gradient: boron is a typical non-metal, aluminium is a metal with several chemical similarities to boron, and gallium, indium and thallium are almost exclusively metallic in character.
The defining feature of the group is the outer electronic configuration $ns^2np^1$ — three valence electrons available for bonding. What changes down the group is the inner core beneath those valence electrons. Boron and aluminium sit on a noble-gas core; gallium and indium carry an additional ten $d$-electrons; thallium carries ten $d$- plus fourteen $f$-electrons. This difference in core makes the electronic structure of the heavier members far more complex than that of the group 1 and group 2 elements, and it is the root cause of the irregularities in their atomic and chemical properties.
| Element | Symbol | Atomic number | Valence configuration | Full core notation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boron | B | 5 | $2s^2 2p^1$ | $[\ce{He}]2s^2 2p^1$ |
| Aluminium | Al | 13 | $3s^2 3p^1$ | $[\ce{Ne}]3s^2 3p^1$ |
| Gallium | Ga | 31 | $4s^2 4p^1$ | $[\ce{Ar}]3d^{10}4s^2 4p^1$ |
| Indium | In | 49 | $5s^2 5p^1$ | $[\ce{Kr}]4d^{10}5s^2 5p^1$ |
| Thallium | Tl | 81 | $6s^2 6p^1$ | $[\ce{Xe}]4f^{14}5d^{10}6s^2 6p^1$ |
Atomic and Physical Data
The atomic and physical constants of the group, taken from the supplement's Table 11.2, are the quantitative backbone for every trend discussed below. Read the table not as numbers to memorise but as evidence: the deviations in radius and ionisation enthalpy are exactly where the inner-core $d$- and $f$-electrons leave their fingerprints.
| Property | B | Al | Ga | In | Tl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atomic mass / g mol⁻¹ | 10.81 | 26.98 | 69.72 | 114.82 | 204.38 |
| Atomic radius / pm | — | 143 | 135 | 167 | 170 |
| $\Delta_iH_1$ / kJ mol⁻¹ | 801 | 577 | 579 | 558 | 589 |
| $\Delta_iH_2$ / kJ mol⁻¹ | 2427 | 1816 | 1979 | 1820 | 1971 |
| $\Delta_iH_3$ / kJ mol⁻¹ | 3659 | 2744 | 2962 | 2704 | 2877 |
| Electronegativity (Pauling) | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| Density / g cm⁻³ (298 K) | 2.35 | 2.70 | 5.90 | 7.31 | 11.85 |
| Melting point / K | 2453 | 933 | 303 | 430 | 576 |
| $E^\circ$ (M³⁺/M) / V | — | −1.66 | −0.56 | −0.34 | +1.26 |
Physical character. Boron is non-metallic — an extremely hard, black solid existing in several allotropic forms; its very strong crystalline lattice gives it an unusually high melting point. The remaining members are soft metals of low melting point and high electrical conductivity. Gallium is a striking exception with a melting point of only 303 K, so it can melt in the hand and exist as a liquid in summer; its very high boiling point (2676 K) makes it useful for measuring high temperatures. Density rises steadily from boron to thallium.
Trend in Atomic Radii
On descending a group one extra electron shell is added at each step, so atomic radius is expected to increase smoothly. The boron family obeys this only partly. The genuine anomaly is that the atomic radius of gallium (135 pm) is smaller than that of aluminium (143 pm) — a reversal of the expected trend.
The cause lies in the inner core. Between aluminium and gallium, ten $3d$-electrons are inserted. These $d$-electrons screen the nuclear charge poorly, so the outermost electrons of gallium feel a higher effective nuclear charge and are drawn inward, shrinking the atom. The same poor screening by intervening $d$- and $f$-electrons recurs lower in the group and underlies the irregular ionisation pattern discussed next.
The expected rise in radius down the group is interrupted at gallium: insertion of ten poorly screening $3d$-electrons raises the effective nuclear charge so that $r(\ce{Ga}) < r(\ce{Al})$.
Ionisation Enthalpy and Electronegativity
Ionisation enthalpy does not fall smoothly down the group as the simple "size increases, electrons leave easily" rule would predict. The decrease from $\ce{B}$ to $\ce{Al}$ is associated with the expected increase in size. But there is a clear discontinuity between $\ce{Al}$ and $\ce{Ga}$, and again between $\ce{In}$ and $\ce{Tl}$: at these steps the newly added $d$- (and later $f$-) electrons screen poorly and fail to offset the larger nuclear charge, so ionisation enthalpy does not drop as expected. For each element the order is, predictably, $\Delta_iH_1 < \Delta_iH_2 < \Delta_iH_3$, and the sum of the first three is very high — a fact that decides their chemistry.
Electronegativity follows a matching zig-zag: it first decreases from $\ce{B}$ ($2.0$) to $\ce{Al}$ ($1.5$), then increases marginally down to thallium ($1.8$). This non-monotonic behaviour is again a consequence of the discrepancies in atomic size produced by the inner $d$- and $f$-cores.
Ionisation enthalpy down group 13 is not a smooth decrease
Students often assume $\Delta_iH_1$ falls steadily $\ce{B} > \ce{Al} > \ce{Ga} > \ce{In} > \ce{Tl}$. It does not: the values dip from $\ce{B}$ to $\ce{Al}$, then rise slightly at $\ce{Ga}$ and again at $\ce{Tl}$ because of poor $d$/$f$ screening. Electronegativity shows the same minimum at $\ce{Al}$, not a clean downward trend.
Remember the shape: minimum at Al, then a marginal rise to Tl — both for ionisation enthalpy and electronegativity.
Oxidation States and the Inert Pair Effect
The group oxidation state is $+3$, matching the three valence electrons. For the lighter members this is the dominant state. As we go down, however, a $+1$ state — two units below the group state — appears and grows in importance. This is the celebrated inert pair effect.
The mechanism is straightforward. Down the group the intervening $d$- and $f$-orbitals shield poorly, so the increased effective nuclear charge holds the $ns^2$ pair tightly and restricts its participation in bonding; only the lone $np^1$ electron is then used. NIOS §18.9 attributes this reluctance to two energetic factors: the high promotion energy needed to reach the bonding-ready valence state, and the poorer orbital overlap (hence weaker bonds) for the large heavy atoms. The relative stability of the $+1$ state therefore rises in the sequence $\ce{Al} < \ce{Ga} < \ce{In} < \ce{Tl}$. In thallium the $+1$ state is predominant, while $\ce{Tl^3+}$ is a powerful oxidising agent.
As the inert pair effect strengthens down the group, the $+3$ state loses stability while the $+1$ state gains it; at thallium the two cross over and $\ce{Tl+}$ becomes the favoured state.
The standard electrode potentials make the crossover quantitative. For aluminium $E^\circ(\ce{Al^3+}/\ce{Al}) = -1.66\ \text{V}$, showing a strong drive to form $\ce{Al^3+}(aq)$; aluminium is a highly electropositive metal. For thallium $E^\circ(\ce{Tl^3+}/\ce{Tl}) = +1.26\ \text{V}$, so $\ce{Tl^3+}$ is unstable in solution and a powerful oxidiser — hence $\ce{Tl+}$ is more stable than $\ce{Tl^3+}$. Energetically, compounds in the $+1$ state are more ionic than those in the $+3$ state.
$\ce{Tl+}$ is more stable than $\ce{Tl^3+}$ — stability of dihalides vs trihalides
Because of the inert pair effect at its strongest in thallium, the lower-state compound is favoured: $\ce{TlI}$ is more stable than $\ce{TlI3}$, and $\ce{TlCl}$ is more stable than $\ce{TlCl3}$. Contrast this with the lighter members, where the trihalide is the stable form — for aluminium $\ce{AlCl3}$ is far more stable than $\ce{AlCl}$, and for indium $\ce{InI3} > \ce{InI}$.
Down the group the $+1$ halide wins; up the group the $+3$ halide wins. The crossover is essentially at Tl.
The electron deficiency that makes these +3 species Lewis acids is fully developed in the chemistry of borax, boric acid and diborane — see Important Compounds of Boron.
Chemical Reactivity
The high sum of the first three ionisation enthalpies dictates the bonding mode. In boron this sum is so large that $\ce{B^3+}$ ions never form; boron is forced into purely covalent compounds. From $\ce{B}$ to $\ce{Al}$ the sum falls considerably, so aluminium readily forms $\ce{Al^3+}$ and acts as a highly electropositive metal. In trivalent compounds the central atom carries only six electrons (as in $\ce{BF3}$); such electron-deficient molecules accept a lone pair to complete the octet and so behave as Lewis acids, the strength of which falls as size grows down the group.
How does $\ce{BF3}$ react with ammonia, and why?
$\ce{BF3}$ has only six electrons around boron — it is electron deficient. Ammonia donates its lone pair to complete boron's octet, forming a stable adduct:
$$\ce{BF3 + :NH3 -> F3B<-NH3}$$
Likewise $\ce{BCl3}$ accepts a lone pair from ammonia to give $\ce{BCl3.NH3}$.
Reactivity towards air
Crystalline boron is unreactive. Aluminium develops a thin protective oxide layer that shields the metal from further attack. On heating in air, amorphous boron and aluminium form their oxides, and with dinitrogen at high temperature they form nitrides:
$$\ce{4Al + 3O2 ->[\Delta] 2Al2O3} \qquad \ce{2Al + N2 ->[\Delta] 2AlN}$$
The acid–base character of the oxides shifts down the group: $\ce{B2O3}$ is acidic and reacts with basic oxides to give borates; $\ce{Al2O3}$ and $\ce{Ga2O3}$ are amphoteric; the oxides of indium and thallium are basic.
Reactivity towards acids and alkalies
Boron does not react with acids or alkalies even at moderate temperature. Aluminium, by contrast, is amphoteric — it dissolves in both mineral acids and aqueous alkalies, liberating dihydrogen:
$$\ce{2Al + 6HCl -> 2AlCl3 + 3H2}$$
$$\ce{2Al + 2NaOH + 6H2O -> 2Na[Al(OH)4] + 3H2}$$
Concentrated nitric acid, however, renders aluminium passive by building a protective oxide film, which is why $\ce{conc. HNO3}$ can be transported in aluminium containers.
Reactivity towards halogens
All these elements react with halogens to form trihalides (the lone exception being $\ce{TlI3}$, which does not exist as a true thallium(III) iodide):
$$\ce{2E + 3X2 -> 2EX3} \quad (\text{E = element; X = F, Cl, Br, I})$$
The monomeric trihalides are electron deficient and act as strong Lewis acids. Boron's maximum covalence is fixed at four ($\ce{BF4-}$) for want of $d$-orbitals, but heavier members complete their octet by halogen bridging — aluminium chloride dimerises to $\ce{Al2Cl6}$, each aluminium accepting electrons from a bridging chlorine.
Anomalous Behaviour of Boron
As the first member of the group, boron differs markedly from its heavier congeners. The reasons echo the lithium–beryllium diagonal anomaly of the s-block: boron's small size, high ionisation enthalpy, high electronegativity, and crucially the absence of $d$-orbitals in its valence shell.
The lack of $d$-orbitals caps boron's covalence at four — it can hold only four electron pairs, so it forms $\ce{BF4-}$ but never $\ce{BF6^3-}$. Aluminium and the heavier elements, having vacant $d$-orbitals, expand their covalence to six and form ions such as $\ce{AlF6^3-}$. This single structural fact explains a whole cluster of boron's peculiarities and is a favourite NEET discriminator.
| Feature | Boron (first member) | Aluminium and heavier members |
|---|---|---|
| Metallic character | Non-metal, hard, high m.p. | Metals, soft, lower m.p. |
| Valence $d$-orbitals | Absent → max covalence 4 | Available → covalence up to 6 |
| Highest fluoro-complex | $\ce{BF4-}$ only (no $\ce{BF6^3-}$) | $\ce{AlF6^3-}$ exists |
| Bonding mode in +3 | Always covalent ($\Delta_iH$ sum very high) | $\ce{Al}$ forms ionic $\ce{Al^3+}$ |
| Action of acids/alkalies | Unreactive at moderate temp. | $\ce{Al}$ amphoteric, dissolves in both |
| Nature of oxide | $\ce{B2O3}$ acidic | $\ce{Al2O3}$ amphoteric; $\ce{In, Tl}$ oxides basic |
Group 13 in one screen
- Members $\ce{B}, \ce{Al}, \ce{Ga}, \ce{In}, \ce{Tl}$; common valence configuration $ns^2np^1$; inner core changes (noble gas → $+10d$ → $+10d, 14f$).
- Atomic radius rises down the group except $r(\ce{Ga}) < r(\ce{Al})$, owing to poor screening by $3d$-electrons.
- Ionisation enthalpy and electronegativity dip to a minimum at $\ce{Al}$, then rise marginally — not a smooth fall.
- Oxidation states $+3$ (group state) and $+1$; inert pair effect makes $+1$ stability rise $\ce{Al} < \ce{Ga} < \ce{In} < \ce{Tl}$, so $\ce{Tl+} > \ce{Tl^3+}$ in stability.
- Trivalent species are electron-deficient Lewis acids; $\ce{Al}$ is amphoteric ($\ce{2Al + 6HCl -> 2AlCl3 + 3H2}$; $\ce{2Al + 2NaOH + 6H2O -> 2Na[Al(OH)4] + 3H2}$).
- Boron is anomalous: small, no $d$-orbitals, covalence capped at 4, no $\ce{BF6^3-}$; $\ce{B2O3}$ acidic.